User:Kaylingonzalez00/Child Sexual Abuse/Isabelle.Rose13 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(provide username) Kaylingonzalez00


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Kaylingonzalez00/Child_Sexual_Abuse?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Child sexual abuse

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Lead/Content

There is not a definitive lead/content area. I think the information currently posted is wonderful for a lead, but would need further information and source material to provide a body for the article. The introductory sentence is informational and to the point. It provides a definition of sexual abuse so the reader knows from the start what the article is about. The information is not overly detailed and provides accurate information. A content area is needed with organized sections related to the lead.

Tone/Balance

The tone of the article is informational and neutral. It does not include any opinions or personal thoughts.

Sources/References

There is only one source so far for this article. The CDC website is the only one listed, but it is a reliable source that was last updated in April of 2022. Other reliable sources should be included to further extend the article and support the information already written.

Organization

There are some spelling and grammatical errors. Remember to use parallel writing in order to help the flow of the article. There is only one short paragraph available, but I would love to see how the article extends into more sections.

Images

No images are provided. I think this would be difficult for such a sensitive topic of research, but if there is a way to add a graph or pie chart of some sort, that may help!

Overall Impressions

The article is incomplete. It does require a content/body area of the article and seems to only have a lead area provided. The addition of more sources would assist in making the article longer. I think you are off to a good start!