User:Kayoff/Psychogenic pain/Mpatel48 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Kayoff


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Kayoff/Psychogenic_pain?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Psychogenic pain

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Wow, your article from the first sentence seems super interesting. As Liz mentioned, I would recommend adding more to your article. I can give you suggestions on what you can add to the body of the article.

- expanding on the emotional events and the relation it could have to one another

-looking at other disorders that this pain can reflect on

-how society views this form of pain

- how this effects various equity gaps

The lead does a good job of drawing the reader in and fully explaining the concept in a few sentences. The lead however doesn't include what you plan on adding from the article. The content provided seems to be up to date. Nothing seems out of the ordinary, you did well with being informative. I would include more about equity gaps. This can be a topic you mention in the body. You can do a lot with this article since it is new. Finding resources may be difficult but you should look at the UAB database, there are a lot of sources on there. The citation you used isn't a secondary source, even though it has accurate information on it, you should find a secondary source. I had the same issue for my article, so i utilized the UAB database and was able to find sources that tied in information from the website. The draft does not meet notability, you will need to provide more sources for the new article to be considered to the platform. I like how the article gave similar articles, so you could list those sources. Overall, you have done a great job adding to the lead section. The information is easy to follow along and is concise. I look forward to seeing what you plan to add to this article.