User:Kayree644900/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
(Feminine Psychology)

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

The history of psychology and other forms of medical specialities certain of medical evolution focused on male participant research to help new discoveries for medical practice. I chose this topic because I am interested on further research about women biological make up and how that affects women's mental health. Choosing this article helped me see some information on what currently is in the idea of feminine psychology and current medical outlook on the topic. The article addresses the importance of taking in the account of social, economic, and political issues to understand the woman's point of view of their psychological make up. My impression of the article was that it supported my idea of the importance of female perspectives to be considered when it comes to research to expand representation on other backgrounds.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

The lead section of the article does cover what is the meaning of the topic and provides background information on how the topic emerged. This section does not included what is later mentioned in the article; it also written in a concise detail rather than oversharing which helps let the article as a whole present the other informational elements. The content with the article was relevant to the topic. It added supportive evidence of different theories and research pertaining to the women experiences. The content was last updated in April 2024. I think more content can be added to help diversify the research part to show all women of backgrounds experiences. It lacks in fulfilling Wikipedia equity gaps. The tone of the article is a neutral tone when reading it nothing seemed emotional just informative. The only claims is the importance of understanding the woman's perspective in life experiences to under their psychological  point of view. The viewpoints of people of a diverse background is highly underrepresented to give a more general outlook covering all people. Adding more of minority perspective will help the information be more informative. The sources in this article are properly linked to other Wiki pages as well as the research article one section of the article shares. I think everything was cited properly. The organization of the article was nice just needed more added information in the research background. Overall it was a good quick source on a topic someone could be interested in learning but for expansive information you would need an outsource for more in depth information.