User:Kaytie.conselva/Antisabia imbricata/Airahlonley Peer Review

General info
Kaytie.conselva
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Kaytie.conselva/Antisabia imbricata
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Antisabia imbricata

Evaluate the drafted changes
Please answer the following questions in detail addressed to the classmate whose article you are reviewing. Remember this is constructive feedback, so be polite and clear in your suggestions for improving their article. We are all working together to improve the Wikipedia pages for species native to Hawaii and for the World to meet.

Use a different font style (bold or italic) for your answers so it is easy for the author to see your comments!

The article does well with the sectioning, formatting, and sharing information on said species. '''In the article, you talk about your species' family and genus, but remember to focus on your species only. Good job on your subtitles for each section! Your headings match the information written under them so nothing to fix there. The writing style is appropriate and your grammar is good!''' '''Each sentence you have is linked to at least one source in your reference list which is great. There is a reference list at the bottom, however, you don't need to make your own reference list, just use what wikipedia has already provided you. The sources are good and you have 5 of them, good job!''' '''Some suggestions that I have are fixing up your reference list and also fixing how you mention your species. Remember to italicize its name. Also, don't start your sentence mentioning your species with "The" and make sure that you spell out your species' name first before using abbreviations. Once you finish that, your article should be good to go for the world to see!''' The most important thing the author could do to improve the article is improve on the things that were stated above and that's all. '''The article I reviewed has subheadings, but I'm not entirely interested in using them, however I will take a look into it. Overall, you did an amazing job!'''
 * 1) First, what does the article do well? (Think about content, structure, complementing the existing article, writing, etc.)
 * 2) * Is there anything from your review that impressed you?
 * 1) Check the main points of the article:
 * 2) * Does the article only discuss the species the article is about? (and not the genus or family)
 * 3) * Are the subtitles for the different sections appropriate?
 * 4) * Is the information under each section appropriate or should anything be moved?
 * 5) * Is the writing style and language of the article appropriate? (concise and objective information for a worldwide audience)
 * 1) Check the sources:
 * 2) * Is each statement or sentence in the text linked to at least one source in the reference list with a little number?
 * 3) * Is there a reference list at the bottom?
 * 4) * Is each of those sources linked with a little number?
 * 5) * What is the quality of the sources?
 * 1) Give some suggestions on how to improve the article (think of anything that could be explained in more details or with more clarity or any issues addressed in the questions above):
 * 2) * What changes do you suggest and how would they improve the article?
 * 3) * Is the article ready for prime-time and the world to see on Wikipedia? If not, how could the author improve the article to be ready?
 * 1) What's the most important thing the author could do to improve the article?
 * 1) Did you notice anything about the article you reviewed that could be applicable to your own article?