User:Kbart264/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Ignaz Schuppanzigh

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I believe it is a very interesting topic to read considering Ignaz Schuppanzigh was a teacher as well as a friend of Beethoven. In addition he was pivotal in transforming the modern string quartet.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

Lead section - This section is very clear and concise and includes all necessary information to get a grasp on the topic. The article also introduces topics that will be discussed in further detail later on.

Content - All of the content presented in the article is relevant as well as up to date. There is nothing missing that io can see. The article does has a bit of an equity gap but that is expected as we are discussing 18th and 19th century Europe.

Tone and balance - The tone and balance is very unbiased as the only thing presented are facts. There aren’t really any viewpoints as again, the information stated is purely factual. No the article doesn’t try to persuade the reader.

Sources and References - The sources are great and represent multiple time periods. The sources used are clearly reliable. They do not include marginalized individuals but they are reliable none the less. All of the links work. I bet there are other great sources but i know of none.

Organization and writing quality - Organization was great but the writing quality could've been better in some spots. There weren’t spelling errors but some sentences could’ve been written better.

Images and Media - There are no pictures or any form of media.

Talk page and discussion - There isn’t much in the talk page but the main things present are people asking if what they want to add is appropriate.

Overall impressions - The status of this article I believe is in good standing. It presents facts with no bias but some of the sentences could be written better as well as pictures and other media could be added. The article is well developed but could use a bit more engaging material.