User:Kbond7/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Hurricane Shark - Wikipedia

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)


 * The heading is good and gives ample amount of clarification and information about what is going on.
 * The content seems very good.
 * Neutral tone and very informative. May seem like it’s trying to persuade due to the lack of representation in the real situations and focusing on hoaxes.
 * It provides a picture of a “Hurricane Shark” that is a hoax, and they clarify that.


 * Would be better if the real events of this happening were in the beginning and the hoaxes should be in the end. Along with the “In popular culture “section."
 * Sources are abundant and are reliable (No academic sources but used what they had)
 * C class article (low importance)
 * Not much on the talk page
 * Balance is okay. There are more hoaxes than real situations in the article.
 * Organization could use some work: Should have shortened the part where it talks about the other events that the picture showed up from. Ex.) Osama Binladin
 * Should have gone more in depth on a few examples instead of fully explaining all of the examples.
 * Only one picture for evidence and a linked video, should have more pictures and videos for the other alleged examples.
 * Overall Impression: Although the article is not necessarily badly written, it definitely has room for improvements.