User:Kbond7/sandbox

Lead section

+

Concise and clear

Uses credible sources

Applies it to a real-world scenario creating relevance

Hyperlinks

Cited well

-

No examples used

Too short

Content

+

Provides connections to psychology, economics, and digital culture

Good historical context

Many real-world applications

-

Sometimes difficult to stay focused when diving to far into the small details

Needs to be updated as social media has taken even more of our attention

Needs more specific examples

Tone and Balance

+

Very clear ideas

Uses citations

Subheadings order well (flow)

+/- Uses complex words

-

Doesn't focus on global ideas more western ideas.

Email spam and web spam should have been combined into one subheading

Limited discussion of ethics etc

Sources and References

+

A lot of references

A lot of hyperlinks

Generally credible sources, Universities and Journals

Provided external links

-

Mostly older cited articles, some dating back to 1960

Flags for additional citations needed

Flags for possibility of containing original research

Organization and Writing Quality

+

Good flow of thoughts

Good level of clarity

Uses unbiased tone

-

Would benefit from a conclusion, it ends very abruptly

Complicated words at times

May benefit from combining some of the subheadings

Images and Media

+

Picture of van with caption explaining the context

Picture of billboard with caption explaining the context

External link to podcast talking about the attention economy

-

Could benefit from1 more picture surrounding the online section, maybe in the Email section

Talk Page Discussion

+

Discussions open to other people editing people's edits

Edits to external links with explanations

Discussions of possible topics that need to be added to the article to finish it

-

Only a few people actively participating

Some slightly snarky words with one of the edit responses

Overall Impressions

This article is generally speaking well written and organized well, although there is room to improve the subheadings and possible add more subheadings with important information which would help to create a more insightful article. Despite the minor areas that need improvements the general basis of the article is well done.

Talk:Attention economy - Wikipedia