User:Kbroderick24/Secondary school/Jiaoyan Zhou Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Kbroderick24


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Secondary school - Wikipedia


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Secondary school - Wikipedia

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)


 * lead section
 * I think this lead is very good. First of all, it is very short and helpful for readers to read. Secondly, the content is summarized and complete, so that readers can quickly know what the whole article is about.
 * There is also a picture next to the lead to help the reader read, which is good.


 * content
 * the article has a clear hierarchy, and the contents section is very clear, so readers can directly click to view the information they want to know.
 * If I were you, I would add the graduation/acceptance rates of secondary schools in each country. Because that seems to me to be an important statistic as well.


 * Overall performance
 * The tone is very formal and the content is very neutral
 * The links to the source are viewed properly and are convincing.
 * The pictures are good

Overall, in my opinion the article is perfect except for only a few minor problems.