User:Kbryso1/sandbox

Article Evaluation:


 * Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?
 * Everything is mostly relevant but a portion describes different sub majors of Curriculum Studies, but does not list all. I feel like if they are going to say a few sub parts of CS then they should include all.
 * Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added?
 * They also mentioned when CS was created but only mentioned a few of its founders
 * What else could be improved?
 * The layout of the information could have been in a more direct way that flowed from beginning of CS to what it has developed into today


 * Is the article neutral? Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * The article is neutral on when describing information but they do mention some opinion based comments
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * I feel like they should have given more information about was CS is now and displayed the information in more of a timeline way


 * Check a few citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article?
 * the source is flagged stating that there are not enough citations and that they are insufficient
 * Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?
 * Many of the sources are neutral and come from high rated WIKI sights or other more institutional style articles


 * What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?
 * Many of the comments left on the talk page discussed that they should add more references throughout the article and more quotes rather than just citing the information at the end. The publisher responded many times about this saying that they added more and asked for comments about the added information. Th
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?
 * The article is flagged for insufficient citations
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?
 * This is somewhat the same. We discuss if the articles are reliable and if they are reputable.  When we act as critical thinkers are look at if the article is biased and if there is more opinionated information.

Citations: