User:Kburge32/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Comparison of chemistry and physics

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this article because it is related to chemistry and physics which are areas I am interested in.

Evaluate the article
The lead section has a good introductory sentence and makes a concise paragraph about the similarities between physics and chemistry. The content is relevant and up to date, with sources from 2010. There isn't any bias, the tone is neutral and doesn't try to persuade a reader in any sort of way. The sources are up to date and have a variety of different authors and the links work to get to the specific sources. The article is clear and concise, and doesn't have any spelling errors. There is one image that is relevant to the material, but it could use some more images to give the readers more to look at. The talk page shows people discussing how the article is well written, but it doesn't seem to be a topic fit for wikipedia. Overall, I think this article is well written and has some good facts in it, but I too agree that it doesn't seem to be an article that necessarily needs to be on Wikipedia.