User:Kc100kc/sandbox

Peer Review
'''Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?''' '''Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?''' '''Check the citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article?'''
 * I think this is a strong addition to the Google Glass page. I'm just curious as to where on the original article you plan to add this.
 * I think you remained fairly neutral. Maybe check to see what outside public reaction has been to the study.  Criticism? Support? (if there is any)

It appears so yes.

'''Is each fact supported by an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?'''

Do you have a source for Justin Wang's participation in the study? There also appear to be a few sentences where you should add citations, but they might be just reusing sources you already have.

'''Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that should be added?'''

Just as Ericka said, continue to follow the Google Glass project throughout the Wiki project to keep the info up to date!

Nm100 (talk) 21:09, 6 March 2018 (UTC)]

Google Glass Project: Stanford Medicine
At Stanford Research there is a team working on finding a way to utilize Google Glass as a tool for behavioral therapy for individuals with autism. As team manager Dennis Wall stated,"We have developed a system using machine learning and artificial intelligence to automate facial expression recognition that runs on wearable glasses and delivers real-time social cues. " An outward-facing camera visually displays facial expressions and developed a system to calculate eye contact. The benefits of google glass are that individuals get to exist in their natural environments. Catalin Voss, founder of the Autism Glass Project stated how flashcards are utilized,"But that doesn't always translate to real-life situations," he said. "Our idea was to try to build a more holistic aid that enables the user to recognize social cues when they actually need to receive those cues right then and there. " Typical behavior therapists have to observe people in isolated situations, while Google Glass can live throughout their typical day. (I think that it is important for Wikipedia to follow the progress made during this case study in order to identify and analyze results.)

[You are Wikipedia! You can follow this and add it to Wikipedia.Erickaakcire (talk) 15:45, 6 March 2018 (UTC)]

Participants Publicly Identified Through Media:
Gabby states: “It’s helped me to understand some people’s emotions,” says Warner, who has autism. “I can tell when a friend is upset better now than I could before. ”
 * Gabby Warner: Gabby Warner is a fourteen year old girl from Campbell, California. Gabby is participating in this study because she wants to validate that technology is a reliable source for educational and emotional purposes.
 * Justin Wang: Justin is a sixteen year old boy from Saratoga, California. Justin would utilize this program daily where he would interact with family members as well as friends. Google glass is versatile and can be presented through smartphones or as glasses.

Google Glass
The wikipedia page describing Google Glass has very limited information. It very clearly represents the design of these glasses and the production timeline, but fails to discuss utilizations. I have read a variety of articles which have stated the benefits of google glass for children with disabilities. I believe that research studies such as this one should be included in this page.

Reality Television
The wikipedia page discussing Reality television has very extensive knowledge about the development of this television industry. There is history about the original shows classifying under this topic, but there is not a lot of modern information. The article stops at a section labeled "2010" but is only two paragraphs about outdated shows such as The Tester. I think that there should be more analysis on how reality television impacts society and discuss questions such as why does we watch this? I also think it is relevant to take a more closer look into how television in general has shifted to reality television.

Article Evaluation
The page Stranger Things is a very credible source of information in regards to this television series, but it does add in some unnecessary and irrelevant information. In the "Mobile Game" section there is an entire paragraph focused around a "game [that] is loosely based on the Stranger Things story after season one." I was very distracted by this paragraph, because I do not believe that a game "loosely" based on the television show is particularly relevant to this page. This article was very biased towards a variety of people who enjoyed the television show, because there were no critiques referencing any disappointments. The "Reception" paragraph seemed to be a bit of an editorial stretch, because the show is aired on netflix. The statistic that "14.07 million adults between the ages 18–49 in the United States" watched Stranger Things was based on data compiled by the Symphony Technology Group. The Symphony Technology Group does not have much information and immediately does not come across as an overly credible source. All of the links work in this article and they are relevant to conversations being discussed The Talk page is currently consisting of an argument between people wanting to add new characters that will appear on season 3, but this season has no aired yet so there are no credible sources confirming new characters. The article is rated as a "C" because it has "low-importance." The way wikipedia discusses this topic differs minimally from what we have discussed in class. The article is divided into complete subsections, but a decent amount of the information is not concise and goes beyond the main point quite often.

Hi I'm in your class!EmilyCarew (talk)