User:Kcobb123/Assistive Technology Acts/Naquach Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Assistive Technology Acts
 * Assistive Technology Acts

Evaluate the drafted changes
The lead section focuses significantly on the design and definition of assistive technologies more than the design of assistive technology acts. The tone of the article is consistent. However, the "Accomplishments of State Tech Act Programs" section uses vague subjective language in "millions of Americans with disabilities are able to...be contributing members of their communities." Additionally, the use of the second-person point of view should be substituted for a third-person point of view. Furthermore, the article could expand on states' differing programs.