User:Kcrane11900/sandbox

Article Evaluation

1. The information was relevant, but it seemed to be missing some general information that would help people be understand the most important part of the Kakao Corporation are. There was great focus on smaller apps, rather than the more significant ones and how they have affected Korea.

2. The article is also not entirely neutral. There are issues with some advertising like wording.

3. The links all seem to work, and to support the articles. The sources seem relatively neutral.

4. Bias in the article has been noted, but recently revised.

5. There is some discussion on weather or not to merge some of the other related pages into one company's main page on wiki.

6. Yes, it is rated as low importance by WikiProjects and as Mid Importance on Wiki Projects Korea

7. We didn't discuss in class how to address changes on merging pages if some topics weren't considered not considered to be of significant importance

Choose a Topic

1. Kakao Talk ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/KakaoTalk/ref>      -The article could use more information on popular characters, and the company as a whole 2. Kakao Corporation https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Kakao/ref>       - The article is a bit biased, lacks information, and has several grammatical errors 3. Japanese Fairytales 4. Samsung