User:Kcruz0311/Social capital/Kaduoos Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? (provide username) KcruzO311
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: Social capital

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer? not at the moment, or if so I'm not seeing it besides in her sandbox area
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? Yes.
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? Yes.
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? No.
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? Concise.

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic? Theres a few paragraphs that seem out of place or like it makes the article too wordy or features unneeded content.
 * Is the content added up-to-date? Yes-article seems to have updates from multiple users
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? Yes, as previously mentioned there seems to be excess content

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral? Yes
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? Theres a few paragraphs that feature only one cite while paraphrasing that one authors work for an extended period.
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? Overrepresented minor connections to topic.
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? No.

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? Yes, I believe some areas need more than one cite in general article though.
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? Yes.
 * Are the sources current? Some work seems a bit dated but still very much relevant.
 * Check a few links. Do they work? Yes.

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? It's a little difficult to read.
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? Not that I caught.
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? The sections could be broken up better by topic/reference.

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? No.
 * Are images well-captioned? N/A
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations? N/A
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way? N/A

For New Articles Only
If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.


 * Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject? Yes.
 * How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject? I think the list is fairly well rounded for the amount of topics relating to social capital that are featured.
 * Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles? It's less organized than typical articles.
 * Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable? Yes.

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete? Yes.
 * What are the strengths of the content added? The content added will provide a strong lead and more concise definition of whats exactly in the article.
 * How can the content added be improved? I think the content being added will be beneficial to the article and the only content that I believe needs improving is structure/relevancy of certain paragraphs.