User:Kding20/Panchayati raj/Destructionuser82 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Kding20


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Not here
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Panchayati raj

Legend

plain text = Mainspace article text

boldface text = my additions

italized text = copyedited text from Mainspace

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Content:

The content added was relevant and does fit into the article at hand. '''However there is repeated information which is unnecessary for the article. ONLY THE second sentence and last sentence is new content for this article.'''

Additionally, this should be in the post-independence period as thats where the 73rd amendment is mentioned.

Tone and Balance:

The tone and balance are pretty good. They don't have any bias as far as I can see

Sources and References:

Solid - no issues here

Organization:

The organization of it is solid, however it's hard to evaluate with the repeated content

Overall Impressions:

I think the placement and the content needs to be edited to fit in the article. Right now there is repeated information and it's placed in the wrong time period.