User:Kdnnz/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Historical background of the New Testament

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
The article is relevant and specific but provides broad contextualization for other important topics.

Evaluate the article
The lead section is not specific enough to let the reader know what the following information will be about. It needs a more general introduction to the article's topic. The content of the article is relevant, specific, and up-to-date. It offers several perspectives that are cited. There are a few instances of subjective language, but it is mostly unbiased and offers facts, not opinions. It does leave out some significant topics of discussion under the scope of the article's title. There are citations for both primary and secondary sources and they draw on a variety of journals and publishers. However, there are several sections that are flagged for a lack of citations. There are few pictures or figures included. The talk page for this article offers many critiques about citations, perspectives, and content. It is an extensive page, but does not cover enough of the historiography of the topic to be considered complete. The article is middle-tier from my perspective because it offers an introductory understanding of the topic but is not comprehensive. It could be improved through added citations and a more thorough discussion of subtopics.