User:Kdwuest/Evaluate an Article

The lead includes an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic. It does not include a brief description of the article's major sections as it skips over her early life. The lead does include information that is not present in the article about Arma's name being attributed to Anna. The lead is not concise as there is limited information within it.

The article's content is relevant to Arma. The content does appear up to date. The content is extremely short which leads one to believe there is content missing though her career was also quite short which could be another reason behind this. The details about Arma's name being attributed to Anna are also missing. This does deal with Women in classical music which is underrepresented.

This article is neutral. There is no sense of a bias throughout. All viewpoints are represented. There are parts where a particular person's viewpoint is reference but it is not clear if it is a widely help viewpoint or not.

There are a few areas that don't appear to have references. There are a fairly decent number of references but they seem to only have small sections about Arma. The sources are as current as I can find. Most of the peer reviewed articles that I can find are already referenced. A large number of the references are to old newspapers with no links attached but the references that do have links seem to work.

The article is fairly clear and easy to read. I do not see any grammatical or spelling errors. The sections are split well for the major points of the topic.

There are only two images in the article but that balances out with how short it is. They are well captioned in a way where I can understand what is happening in them. Both of these images appear to be in the public domain. The images are set out of the way the the text wrapped well around it.

There is not any conversation happening in the talk section. This article is part of three wikiprojects including classical music, women's history, and biography: musicians. There doesn't seem to be a rating in the talk section that I can see put the wikiedu section the article is listed in says that it is rated as start class. We have not discussed this topic much in class aside from the brief overview when we went over the article section of wikiedu.

This article is in fairly decent shape considering how underrepresented women are in classical music. The sections are well referenced. The main drawback in this article is the length as there is not as much information about Arma as one would hope. This article is well developed but feels unfinished.

Which article are you evaluating?
(Provide a link to the article here.)

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)