User:Kearnsdm

{| style="width: 100%; background-color: #87CEFA; border: 5px solid #FF7F50; padding: 10px; margin-bottom: 8px; vertical-align: top;"
 * colspan=3 style="vertical-align:top" |

Hello! Feel free to leave me a message.

Non-neutral sources
I have seen some editors rely on non-neutral sources for their edits. According to Wikipedia policy, sources should be reliable. The policy states that "reliable sources are credible published materials with a reliable publication process; their authors are generally regarded as trustworthy, or are authoritative in relation to the subject at hand." As such, inflammatory sources are not ideal, except to extent that they represent a particularly noteworthy perspective on a controversial topic.

No sources for non-neutral information
Acording to Jimmy Wales, founder of Wikipedia, including unsourced, non-neutral information should be aggressively removed. He wrote in May 2006, "I can NOT emphasize this enough. There seems to be a terrible bias among some editors that some sort of random speculative 'I heard it somewhere' pseudo information is to be tagged with a 'needs a cite' tag. Wrong.  It should be removed, aggressively, unless it can be sourced."

Important Links
Wikipedia Formatting Information

Wikipedia Link Syntax

Web colors

Wikipedia Editing Technical Information