User:Keelytubbs26/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
(Provide a link to the article here.)

Cello

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

It’s something I’m passionate about and would consider myself a member of the community. I would like to be able to spread the word of the best ways to take care of the INTRUST ent and for it to be accessible on Wikipedia for whoever needs to see it.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

the lead section is concise but gives enough information about what will be spoken about in the article. It gives a brief explanation about the cello as well by explaining basic facts about it. All the content is up to date and goes with the article. As well as it is backed up with facts and sources that are relevant and trustworthy. I checked the links and did my best to make sure they were valid. Everything was organized in a way that is easy to read and find facts you would need to find. Though I feel like it was missing an important section about instrument care. In the talk page most of the conversations were just to make sure all the information and pictures were accurate, though it was very active and it seems it’s mostly been editing down to where the facts are accurate. I think the article is easy to read and mostly complete. The main issue is just the fact that there isn’t a section with information I feel is important and not super available everywhere online. I would just like to help others find information easier than when I tried to find it. I think it was a well developed and put together article overall.