User:Kefalonia/Anonymous editor


 * Anonymous_editor (talk • contribs • [ blocks] • [ protects] • [ deletions] • [ moves])

Users should only edit one summary or view, other than to endorse.

Statement of the dispute
''This is a summary written by users who dispute this user's conduct. Users signing other sections ("Response" or "Outside views") should not edit the "Statement of the dispute" section.''

Description
''{Add summary here, but you must use the section below to certify or endorse it. Users who edit or endorse this summary should not edit the other summaries, other than to endorse them.}''

Evidence of disputed behavior
(Provide diffs. Links to entire articles aren't helpful unless the editor created the entire article. Edit histories also aren't helpful as they change as new edits are performed.)


 * Wikipedia_talk:Requests_for_adminship/Anonymous_editor


 * Requests for adminship/Anonymous editor


 * Requests for adminship/Anonymous editor 2

Talk pages

 * Talk:Terrorism_in_Pakistan
 * Talk:Kargil War
 * http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Nichalp&diff=prev&oldid=24988801 "A problem user"
 * http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Anonymous_editor&diff=prev&oldid=24700752
 * Talk:Terrorism_in_Kashmir

Articles

 * Terrorism in Kashmir
 * Comment: Sometimes deleted the whole statistics section because it contained information on numbers of people killed by terrorists and of numbers of Kashmiris that fled, other deletions, Edit wars, etc. Readers can judge themselves.
 * http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Terrorism_in_Kashmir&diff=24871019&oldid=24870945 removes the whole statistics section, because he doesnt like the information in it which states how many approx were killed by terrorists and how many Kashmiris had to flee their homeland.
 * There were over 11 edits by AE (including 3RR) on terrorism in kashmir where AE insisted to have an npov tag with the words "npov because of a pro-indian bias", instead of the much more neutral plain npov tag (with explanation on talk) or the more fair mention of both pov's in the npov tag.
 * http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Terrorism_in_Kashmir&diff=26142566&oldid=26142241 Here he deletes that Pakistan was involved in the attack on Kashmir. It is however generally accepted that this was indeed the case. Should have been at least discussed on talk.
 * http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Terrorism_in_Kashmir&diff=23611720&oldid=23574960 deletes Human Right abuses/terrorists, rm taliban/bin laden
 * http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Terrorism_in_Kashmir&diff=17873492&oldid=17873399 I have to check this, seems like deletions
 * http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Terrorism_in_Kashmir&diff=17837371&oldid=17837114 Writes that Buddhists have never shown desire to "join india". Quite wrong for obvious reasons.
 * http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Terrorism_in_Kashmir&diff=prev&oldid=17837371 same as above (the Buddhists in Kashmir have never shown any desire to join India)
 * http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Terrorism_in_Kashmir&diff=15870444&oldid=15870276 Deletions of for example statistics section and other material
 * Terrorism in Pakistan
 * Comment: Many edit wars. I don't want to take sides and blame everything on AE, readers can judge for themselves. I think some of the discussions that AE was involved with also concerned this article. There was a proposed Request for comment, not sure if it was about this article or about other articles.
 * http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Terrorism_in_Pakistan&limit=500&action=history See the history for edit wars
 * http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Terrorism_in_Pakistan&diff=24868618&oldid=24868288 deletions
 * http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Terrorism_in_Pakistan&diff=24871525&oldid=24870400 deletes taliban
 * http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Terrorism_in_Pakistan&diff=24834139&oldid=24832643 deletions
 * http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Terrorism_in_Pakistan&diff=24832236&oldid=24831830 deletions
 * http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Terrorism_in_Pakistan&diff=24831448&oldid=24831024 del
 * http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Terrorism_in_Pakistan&diff=24828154&oldid=24827735 del
 * http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Terrorism_in_Pakistan&diff=24827615&oldid=24827434 deletion of newspaper source
 * http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Terrorism_in_Pakistan&diff=24800538&oldid=24784132 deletion
 * http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Terrorism_in_Pakistan&diff=24746390&oldid=24746154 deletes reference from an important indian newspaper, explains this later by calling rediff.com a blog site! See http://www.rediff.com http://in.rediff.com/headline.html http://in.rediff.com/news/index.html
 * http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Terrorism_in_Pakistan&diff=24746068&oldid=24744128
 * http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Terrorism_in_Pakistan&diff=24704210&oldid=24703978 deletes reference (rediff.com)
 * http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Terrorism_in_Pakistan&diff=24703850&oldid=24703514 deletes reference
 * State terrorism: edit wars. Didn't look at this in great detail. Again I'm not blaming everything on AE.
 * http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=State_terrorism&diff=24967510&oldid=24966216
 * http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=State_terrorism&diff=24964639&oldid=24947730
 * http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=State_terrorism&diff=24934300&oldid=24934177
 * http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=State_terrorism&diff=24934507&oldid=24934322
 * http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=State_terrorism&diff=24928305&oldid=24927874
 * http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=State_terrorism&diff=24924975&oldid=24924321
 * Islamic invasion of India
 * http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Islamic_invasion_of_India&diff=15402264&oldid=15402221 AE writes: "A few controversial historical records state that under his rule some of the populace was put to death while others do not state this." This edit is controversial and may be an attempt at revisionism. There are many contemporary and later histories that explicitly state the details about these Muslim rulers.
 * http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Islamic_invasion_of_India&diff=14838805&oldid=14838519 large edits, deletes ext. links
 * http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Islamic_invasion_of_India&diff=16473778&oldid=15834530 puts quotations about genocides under a section called "critical views". This is quite controversial.
 * http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Islamic_invasion_of_India&diff=15834392&oldid=15834188 deletes sourced quote
 * http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Islamic_invasion_of_India&diff=15834069&oldid=15759429 del
 * Other articles
 * http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Pervez_Musharraf&diff=23846990&oldid=23821138 deletion
 * http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Women_in_Islam&diff=24755499&oldid=24755441 this is minor but the edit summary is very wrong
 * http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Military_of_Pakistan&diff=15782937&oldid=15782785 ??
 * http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lashkar-e-Toiba&diff=15843308&oldid=15842783 deletions
 * http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lashkar-e-Toiba&diff=15840324&oldid=15839301 ??
 * http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Uniform_civil_code&diff=16158583&oldid=15450870 deletion
 * Genocides in history
 * http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Genocides_in_history&diff=25543177&oldid=25540938 Says that indian army commit more atrocities than the terrorists. This is a controversial and potentially false-claim and pov edit and should at least be sourced/discussed. (Terrrorist killed more than 30'000 people since about 1989, more than 300'000 fled).
 * http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Genocides_in_history&diff=24748471&oldid=24728230 controversial and potentially false-claim edit with no sources
 * http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Genocides_in_history&diff=24333552&oldid=24324567 deletes massacres on sikhs, other
 * http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Genocides_in_history&diff=23618620&oldid=23614758 see above
 * http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Genocides_in_history&diff=15495068&oldid=15478401 genocide is only population decrease
 * Kargil War
 * Revert wars between September 25 and September 28: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Kargil_War&limit=500&action=history
 * http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Kargil_War&diff=24225194&oldid=24225083 edit war/del
 * http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Kargil_War&diff=24013450&oldid=24006001 edit war/del
 * http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Kargil_War&diff=24002346&oldid=23999700 edit war/del
 * Kashmir:
 * http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Kashmir&diff=26194079&oldid=26187264 deletes reference
 * http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Kashmir&diff=26119997&oldid=26119373 ??
 * http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Kashmir&diff=26119157&oldid=26118451 could be deletion
 * http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Kashmir&diff=15534128&oldid=15533880 ??
 * http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Kashmir&diff=15530408&oldid=15529567 ??

Applicable policies
{list the policies that apply to the disputed conduct}

Evidence of trying and failing to resolve the dispute
(provide diffs and links)

Users certifying the basis for this dispute
{Users who tried and failed to resolve the dispute}

(sign with ~ )

Other users who endorse this summary
(sign with ~ )

Response
''This is a summary written by the user whose conduct is disputed, or by other users who think that the dispute is unjustified and that the above summary is biased or incomplete. Users signing other sections ("Statement of the dispute" and "Outside Views") should not edit the "Response" section.'' ''

{Add summary here, but you must use the endorsement section below to sign. Users who edit or endorse this summary should not edit the other summaries.}

Users who endorse this summary (sign with ~ ):

Outside view
''This is a summary written by users not directly involved with the dispute but who would like to add an outside view of the dispute. Users editing other sections ("Statement of the dispute" and "Response") should not edit the "Outside Views" section, except to endorse an outside view.''

{Add summary here, but you must use the endorsement section below to sign. Users who edit or endorse this summary should not edit the other summaries.}

Users who endorse this summary (sign with ~ ):

Discussion
All signed comments and talk not related to an endorsement should be directed to this page's discussion page. Discussion should not be added below. Discussion should be posted on the talk page. Threaded replies to another user's vote, endorsement, evidence, response, or comment should be posted to the talk page.