User:Keilahann/sandbox

The fact that they mentioned that she was the second child, and her parents had a still born child before her. this, in my opinion is irrelevant to who she is or her accomplishments. Also the idea of who she was named after for my is fluff information that isn't very important. I liked the mentioning of how her mother raised her, it gives a background for who she is. I did like the mentioning of her getting clippings of male dominated fields and a woman's success in them, this really shows her desire to be great. The article is seemingly neutral, this particular article isn't completely representing the flight she took and many conspiracies that follow it, rather, who she became because of her love for aviation. There are many mentions of her having an attitude of being a very successful women in this field which I think is interesting because it intersect very perfectly with gender and technology. The links for this article work. There are many links throughout the article that I thought did not necessarily need to be there, however, this may be required of the article. There are many different sources and citations for information for this article. For the portion of Amelia going missing, many of the references is information based off of the evidence that we know. There have been new theories and evidence to come to surface about Amelia and her going missing, I don't see it included in the article. Some conversation going on in the talk pages is about evidence regarding different flight theories. This article is rated class B, and is a part of projects like the women writers project. In many other articles that we have read in class, we have seen and been able to identify that there is some sort of divide when it comes to women and science. For starters, STEM programs are not always advertised or tailored for women, causing the problem of there not being enough women in the field or the misrepresentation of the discoveries women are making. Amelia Earhart was a great example of being independent and able to pursue a field in the sciences. Her mother had encouraged her from a young age to pursue science. She took her to the best high school for that. When she was older and her pursuits became more in align with aviation specifically, she joined clubs and organizations that promoted women being involved in aviation. I think Earhart is a perfect example and face of women being on the forefront of technology. This would be a point that I would like to see highlighted more throughout the article.