User:Keithrlee13/Academic specialization/Kara0719 Peer Review

The lead is a good start and clearly stated the topic. I would like to see more sections to the article and a description of it.

Lead is concise.

I would like to see more types of specialization and more content in the body paragraphs.

I do not think it addresses an equity gap.

The content does appear to be neutral. There aren't too many viewpoints represented but it is represented in an unbiased fasion.

There are not very many sources and there needs to be more sources from different academic works.

Adding a graphic or an image would help enhance your page and make it more interesting.

Overall, I think this is a good start but could use some more writing.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(provide username)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)