User:Kekekandy/Ligand/Audiolosh Peer Review

General info
Kekekandy
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Kekekandy/Ligand - Wikipedia:
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Ligand - Wikipedia

Evaluate the drafted changes
- I can see that you are adding to the hapticity section and ligand exchange reactions sections

- This is good since these sections are the least developed in the original page

- you also go into specific reactions

- I appreciate also that you only did a brief summary, not a whole long paragraph on these specific reactions since they already have a wikipedia page

- if the suzuki reaction has a page then this should be linked as well

- There is a good amount of sources present and there are primary sources as well

Lead/ content

- The hapticity portion, a good amount has been added here

- I do not think anything "more" needs to be added to hapticity since the topic of hapticity already has an article that exists

- The opening for ligand exchange provides concise detail to understand the topic with credible sources

Tone and balance

- overall tone is neutral, matching the wikipedia guidelines

- Good balance between the two sections you expanded on

- not too much or too little on either, but reflecting on what is currently known and what sections already have wikipedia pages dedicated to them

Sources and references

- a good amount of secondary sources

- a mix of older and newer 2023 sources so your information is very up to date

- you also include a few primary reference sources

- your content reflects the information found in sources and paraphrased

- I checked some of the sources and they work fine.

images

- I see that you are planning to insert these later

Organization

- Currently the organization works fine

- Just ensure that they are going to the right spots when placed on the original article

- Is there another way to indicate subcategories of different types of reactions?

- ie. indent?

Overall

- I think this page is a very strong wikipedia article.

- you have a lot of meaningful content additions that are concise

- I personally do not see much to be improved unless you are thinking of expanding other parts of the wikipedia article such as "Ligand-protein-binding-database"