User:Kekekandy/Ligand/JShaw2003 Peer Review

General info
KekeAndy
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Kekekandy/Ligand
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Ligand:

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead:

The lead has not really been updated by the user, however the lead in the original article is very long. Maybe the user can help reduce that section.

content:

The user expands on the hapticity section and ligand exchange section. These sections are underdeveloped in the original article so it is good that the user is helping to fix that. The content seems up to date and relevant and is helpful in adding to the quality of the article.

Tone and balance:

The content is written in a neutral tone, no bias is observed in the text. There does not seem to be any bold claims, everything stated is supported by a source!

Sources and references:

The sources are mostly relevant, most of them are from 2023 so very up to date. There are a couple of older references from early 200's and late 90's so it might be a good idea to try and find some more recent papers to reference. They have an extensive bibliography. The citation link all seem to work well.

Organization:

I think this is organized well, the user is adding two sub sections which are distinct from each other but help develop the overall topic of the paper.

Images and Media:

no images are added. Maybe you can add an image for hapticity or ligand exchange.

Overall:

Overall this article is well done, I believe the contributions you are making will help develop the main article. You might want to consider finding a couple more recent sources and including some images. The quality of the writing is good and unbiased and is up to the standards of Wikipedia. good job!