User:Kelleyschiedler/SOB X RBE/Jstnwoo Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? (provide username) Kelleyschiedler
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: User:Kelleyschiedler/SOB X RBE

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer? Yes
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? Yes
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? No
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? No
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? The lead is concise

Lead evaluation
I think your lead does is maybe a little bit too concise, maybe one or two more sentences introducing the group members could be beneficial.

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic? Yes
 * Is the content added up-to-date? Yes
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? No

Content evaluation
Good job updating the content of the page, especially stating that Lul G is not an active member anymore due to his murder charges. I also like that you added bibliographies for each member of the group.

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral? Yes
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? No
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? No
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? No

Tone and balance evaluation
I think your article maintains a very neutral tone, making sure not to use certain words that give praise or talk down on the group.

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? Yes
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? Yes
 * Are the sources current? Yes
 * Check a few links. Do they work? Yes

Sources and references evaluation
Good job on adding quite a few new sources/references. I like that you have sources from many different/reputatable news outlets like Billboard and Youtube interviews of the group.

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? Yes
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? No
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? Yes

Organization evaluation
I think the content is organized very well, content doesn't seem spread too thin or clustered and looks very presentable.

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? Yes
 * Are images well-captioned? Yes
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations? Yes
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way? Yes

Images and media evaluation
I think the image used at the top is very good, I think more images could be added of the group or album covers would be a nice detail.

For New Articles Only
If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.


 * Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject?
 * How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject?
 * Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles?
 * Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable?

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete? Yes
 * What are the strengths of the content added? The biggest strength added to the article would be the bibliographies, they add a lot of new content to the page.
 * How can the content added be improved? Maybe more content on their creative direction on their music.

Overall evaluation
Overall I think you added a lot of great content and sources. Keep trying to add more content and I think the page will become more solid than it already is, maybe try adding more information about their music or awards if any.