User:Kelliecarblue/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Rosemary and Peter Grant

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
This article is a joint article for two married biologist. Some of their research is done together, but they are two people and the information about each of them individually is also important.

Lead Section
The lead section does a good job at introducing them as a couple and what they have done in research.

This lead section is followed by an early years and that need to be worked on. It is mostly about Peter and in a joint article in need to include more about Rosemary.

Content
The content in the article is a little dated. More could be include about their more recent research and publications.

There are also article linked that do not exist on Wikipedia.

Tone and Balance
The article is neutral. But the balance between information between Peter and Rosemary needs to be worked on.

The article only includes information about Peter's Individual research and not much if any of Rosemary's.

Sources and References
Most things are cited.

There is a section of awards given to Peter that do not have a references at all.

The references also are up to date and linked correctly.

Organization and Writing Quality
The organization is off. I think it is because of it being for two people. If it was separated then it would flow easer.

It is written well despite the large information gap of Rosemary's stuff.

Images and Media
Images are linked and gotten correctly. Could include a picture of them together.

Talk Page Discussion
The conversations are mostly about separating the article into two and add to both.

Overall Impressions
I think this article need to be split into 2. They have done research together and are married by the article would be more beneficially to readers if it was separated.