User:Kelliecarblue/Peter and Rosemary Grant/Giggles5858 Peer Review

This article begins with a very informative introduction sentence that addresses their names, birthdates, who they are in terms of profession and where they work.The article also states what their most known accomplishment is and the progress they contributed to previous studies. The article as a choice for a student in our course is rather strange as it is a lengthy, very well written article. This article speaks about their research in a neutral manner as it explains their research and how they performed the studies. Their Galapagos island research seemed to be overrepresented in this Wiki article, but that is understandable as it is their most known work. They also mention how the couple received the Darwin Wallace Medal. The source links of the article work and are fairly recent and u to date, with one being from 2019. They support the claims in the article and offer the couple as features in some of the articles regarding their work. The sources come from various articles, educational websites, and even news articles. The articles are educational and peer-reviewed, while also being from a non-biased point of view. Even though the news articles may seem as if they would be biased, it serves to inform readers about the couple's work preceding Charles Darwin.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(provide username)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)