User:KellyJoB445/Choose an Article

Article Selection
Please list articles that you're considering for your Wikipedia assignment below. Begin to critique these articles and find relevant sources.

Option 1

 * Article title
 * Internet in Cuba

Lead
The lead for this page does not include a description of the article's sections or the article's topic. It is a short paragraph with a subjective sentence about why internet in Cuba was lacking funding, as well as including information not in the rest of the page.

Content

 * Guiding questions
 * The article has been updated regularly, however there are still large aspects of it that need expansion or an update, as marked by Wikipedia. I also think that the page should be updated within its wording in order to make it more clear for the reader. The sources in this article need to be reviewed thoroughly. Out of the 24 different sources, seven of them lead to dead links, and many of them are not from reputable sources. One of them is also a link to a PDF of a paper, which is an almost research paper from a California State University, Long Beach Student. The newest article is dated from 2013, and can only be sourced through the Wayback Machine to a page link. They overall are not thorough, and even though there are not a lot of sources on this topic there still needs to be more information.


 * Article Evaluation
 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic?
 * It's relevant in the sense that it gives basic information on when the internet was implemented and what has developed, however it has not talked about how the internet has shaped popular culture or had any influence on the life of those that live in Cuba. It could definitely have more relevant information added about its impact on society in Cuba, the government, popular culture, etc.
 * Is it written neutrally?
 * It is written neutrally and gives neutral citations
 * Does each claim have a citation?
 * Not each claim has a citation
 * Are the citations reliable?
 * Most of the citations are reliable, however they seem to be sparse or spread out weirdly, leaving gaps of credibility.
 * Check out the article's Talk page to see what other Wikipedians are already contributing. Consider posting some of your ideas to the article's Talk page, too.
 * Sources
 * Baron, G., & Hall, G. (2015). Access Online: Internet Governance and Image in Cuba. Bulletin of Latin American Research, 34(3), 340–355. https://doi.org/10.1111/blar.12263
 * Henken, T. A. (2017). Cuba’s Digital Millennials: Independent Digital Media and Civil Society on the Island of the Disconnected. Social Research, 84(2), 429–456.
 * Kellogg, S. P. (2018). Networks in Contact, Networks in Conflict. NACLA Report on the Americas, 50(2), 201–203. https://doi.org/10.1080/10714839.2018.1479490
 * Kellogg, S. P. (2018). Networks in Contact, Networks in Conflict. NACLA Report on the Americas, 50(2), 201–203. https://doi.org/10.1080/10714839.2018.1479490

Option 2

 * Article title
 * Networked Feminism


 * Article Evaluation
 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic?
 * The content is relevant, however it has not really been expanded upon within each of the categories that have been described (ex. Social Media, Examples, etc.) Along with this, a lot of the information that is put in looks at networked feminism through a United States lens as opposed to a worldly lens.
 * Is it written neutrally?
 * The article is written neutrally during the background, however as it continues it becomes less and less neutral. This can be important in articles like this, where there can be some differing opinions. The article also has a heavy bias to the United States and its current events, which takes away some of its neutralness.
 * Does each claim have a citation?
 * There are not a lot of large claims that they make, however each of the examples that they give have citations.
 * Are the citations reliable?
 * The citations are mostly reliable.


 * Sources
 * Adair, C., & Nakamura, L. (2017). The Digital Afterlives of This Bridge Called My Back: Woman of Color Feminism, Digital Labor, and Networked Pedagogy. American Literature, 89(2), 255–278. https://doi.org/10.1215/00029831-3861505
 * Fotopoulou, A. (2016). Digital and networked by default? Women’s organisations and the social imaginary of networked feminism. New Media & Society, 18(6), 989–1005. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814552264
 * Ringrose, J., & Lawrence, E. (2018). Remixing misandry, manspreading, and dick pics: networked feminist humour on Tumblr. Feminist Media Studies, 18(4), 686–704. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2018.1450351

Option 3

 * Article title
 * International Feminist Journal of Politics


 * Article Evaluation
 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic?
 * The content is somewhat relevant, but it does not go nearly in depth enough about the work that the journal does, as well as its overall content and influence. Therefore, it's relevant but it could be better
 * Is it written neutrally?
 * Yes, the content is written neutrally I believe.
 * Does each claim have a citation?
 * It does not, it only has three citations. However, it would be hard to source citations as it is a journal as opposed to a claim or idea.
 * Are the citations reliable?
 * The citations are reliable


 * Sources
 * International Feminist Journal of Politics. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.ifjpglobal.org/
 * International Feminist Journal of Politics. (2020, January 28). Retrieved from https://www.tandfonline.com/toc/rfjp20/current

Option 4

 * Article title
 * Internet in Agriculture


 * Article Evaluation
 * Sources
 * Sources

Option 5

 * Article title
 * Article Evaluation
 * Sources
 * Sources
 * Sources