User:Kellychen927/Judson Gallery/Clouds90210 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Kellychen927


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Kellychen 927 / ELIZA effect
 * Bibliography


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * ELIZA effect
 * ELIZA effect

Evaluate the article
Overall, the article is pretty short with only 2 sections of information and an introduction that is only 1 sentence long. Also slightly strange due to the 15 sources listed under "Notes" and "References," two sections that should probably be combined. Any sources not used in the edit can be added to a "Further reading" section. Finally, the introduction is an easy opportunity for improvement if it's made longer and more detailed.

Evaluate the drafted changes
The addition of a "Significance" section works quite well as a way to discuss feminized labor and include the 4 additional sources listed below. The length of the section fits the rest of the article and allows it to end with information on how the effect has influenced us today, bringing it to the "now." Finally, the first source has an error on the date, so that should be resolved, but otherwise the edits are very well-done.