User:Kelsey.rakoczy/Classical education movement/Emmaschroder Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Kelsey.rakoczy


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Kelsey.rakoczy/Classical_education_movement?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Classical education movement

Evaluate the drafted changes
1.How much scholarly evidence did the group use on the page?

Kelsey added four reliable sources, all of which enhanced the article. One suggestion I have is in regards to this sentence added to the "Classical Education in schools" section: "The Well-Trained Mind: A Guide to the Classical Education You Never Had," by Susan Wise Bauer, is a modern reference on classical education. I'm not sure if this citation fits in this section. If it does, maybe a few more sentences to explain how this text is related to classical education in schools.

2.How effectively did the group incorporate visuals into the page?

Kelsey included two images that explain the trivium of education. These images are very helpful to the article considering the word is used a couple of times.

3.How well written was the page?

Everything was very well written. I didn't see any grammar issues, and the additions flowed well with the rest of the article.

I wonder if it would be beneficial to add a section that discusses the "opposite" of classical education. I hadn't known what classical education was before reading this article, and am now curious what the other types would be. This also might help clarify what classical education exactly is to readers.