User:Kelsey.rakoczy/Classical education movement/FawnTail Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Kelsey.rakoczy


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Kelsey.rakoczy/Classical education movement


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Classical education movement

Evaluate the drafted changes
1.How much scholarly evidence did the group use on the page?


 * Did they include at least three in-text citations? At least three in-text citations were added.
 * What was the quality of the references? References used are high quality books. I was wondering if you have a full reference or online link to the Dorothy Sayers essay?
 * Were summaries from the reference appropriate? (no plagiarism!) The entry overall was rewritten to be more concise and informative, allowing the reader to understand the history and present day use of classical education more easily.

2.How effectively did the group incorporate visuals into the page?


 * Did they include at least two images on the page and what was the quality of the images? Your visuals are superb! Both of your added visuals allow the reader to easily understand the trivium. Your visual summaries are a valuable addition to the original article.

3.How well written was the page?


 * Grammar, punctuation, and sentence structure. I was wondering if you might reword the last sentence of your entry. I think you might mean "tend to rely upon" instead of "tend to rely for upon."
 * Was the page written in a way that made it accessible for the public? (No jargon) The reworked paragraphs make understanding the classical education history and present-day application much easier to understand. I was wondering if in the first paragraph since classical education movement is already in bold font if it also needs to be in quotes. Additionally, perhaps quotes are not necessary for primary, secondary, and tertiary education under the three phases of education, but I am not sure of Wikipedia's preferences for quotes. Overall, your additions are excellent revisions of the original article, especially the visuals you created. Nicely done!