User:KemistryKody/Nanoring/Achia UW Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? KemistryKody
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nanoring&oldid=928264856

Lead

 * The improvements made to the nanorings article are a great start, but might need some more fleshing out to fully illustrate the point of nanorings in applications. Furthermore, the author has done a wonderful job explaining the mechanisms of their creation, so that must be lauded. If given more time, I think this could be a wonderful article.

Content

 * I think from a starting point, the explanations are on point and get to the meat of the matter without confusing me as the reader. While this might not be true for all readers, particularly those who do not have a background in inorganic chemistry, I think the content works well for me.

Tone and Balance

 * I think the author does a great job of not injecting their own opinions, while still informing the audience of the information through their expertise. The writing is easy to read and informative, which I believe is the best kind of technical writing.

Sources and References

 * The links work well and the information is certainly up to date. I think that one suggestion I might have is to include more information from application type journals, but I think for that would also come with a longer article.

Organization

 * Again, the article is still in the first steps of adding applications, so this prompt is harder to answer. However, I think given what is given on ZnO nanoframes, the author clearly has the capacity to create more information and a wonderful article if they had more time. Personally, I am biased towards explaining the basic science before jumping into the further considerations that are talked about later, so they did a great job in my eyes.

Overall impressions
Overall, this is a great article that needs more length. I am not sure if the author is interested in expanding on it further, but I think they have been doing a great job setting up the framework for future contribution.