User:Kemrishae/Cannula (archaea)/MeaniePanini Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Kemrishae and Rockwithagun


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Kemrishae/Cannula_%28archaea%29?veaction=edit&preload=Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Does not appear to exist

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Lead
The lead is concise. However, the sentence mentioning hydrothermal marine locations doesn't get mentioned later in the article. There needs to be some formatting mistakes corrected as well.

Content
The content is up to date and is well structured. It is all applicable to the topic. However, the last sentence seems to end abruptly. Some grammar and formatting could be adjusted.

Tone and Balance
Everything is neutral and there are no opinions. Overall the tone and balance are great.

Sources and References
The references section seems to be formatted incorrectly. Additionally, the whole paper seems like it may be lacking some references. Also, the first reference was only used in the intro, so it could be used for the body of the article as well.

Organization
Organization is good, but they could break up the paragraphs into multiple sections if they wanted to.

Images and Media
Not applicable.

New Article
There are enough sources, but the first source could be used more. The formatting of the headings could be fixed.

Overall Impressions
Looks good, main things that need to be fixed are the formatting issues mentioned previously. The information looks good.