User:Kemrishae/Cannula (archaea)/Taylorbr97 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Kemrishae


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Kemrishae/Cannula_%28archaea%29?veaction=edit&preload=Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead:

The abstract was short and to the point, it did not use any words or material that the average person doing research on this subject would have to investigate into more. The information provided is neutral and does not have a specific view point. All information pertaining to the lead is spoken of later in the article. I think it would be good to have a picture of a cannula to help the reader visualize what the article is about.

Guiding questions:

This is also neutral pertaining to the article and does not sway to a particular view point. As spoken of before there are no pictures but i believe it would be helpful, as this is not well studied it is hard to obtain pictures so it is understandable why there are none. There are only three sources, the main reason for writing articles is to educate the reader as well as giving them many resources. This also helps to solidify the validity of the article.

Overall impressions:

This is a great draft and has the opportunity to continually be added upon. As spoken of in the introduction it is not really studied yet so not much information is provided. This article is a great skeleton for future research and information to be added in later.