User:Kenadie645/Evaluate an Article

Article evaluation on the article June.

June - Wikipedia

Lead section:


 * The lead section on this article does have a clear and concise introduction sentence. It clearly states facts about the month June.
 * It clearly states facts that are in the following paragraphs.
 * the paragraph only contains information that is in the rest of the article. there are no content gaps.
 * the lead is a little overly detailed but not too much.

Content:


 * all of the information in the article is related to the topic.
 * the content is up-to-date
 * the article has information in it for the history of the month of June.

Tone and Balance:


 * The article is all neutral, there are no sides that are more presented than others.
 * the article does not attempt to persuade the reader in any way.

Source and References:


 * All of the information and facts in the article are backed up by a reliable source.
 * The sources are veery thorough, they explain all of the information in the article.
 * the sources are current.
 * the links to the resources do work.

Organization and writing quality:


 * this article is very clear and easy to read.
 * the article does not have any spelling or grammatical errors.
 * all of the pictures meet the copyright regulations.
 * the images are not necessarily appealing to the eye.

Talk page discussions:


 * the conversations are just talking about all of the information in the article.
 * the article is rated low on the importance scale, the article is not in any WikiProjects.
 * the article differs from articles in class because it does not have any relation to anything we have talked about.

overall impressions:


 * the articles strength are that it gives a very detailed background of the month.
 * the article can be improved by giving more information on the holidays in june.
 * the article is very well developed and clear.