User:KendallUW/Palazzo Pubblico/Ccallihan Peer Review

General info
KendallUW
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:KendallUW/Palazzo Pubblico:
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Palazzo Pubblico

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Lead:

Good lead that provides info about Palazzo Pubblico's civic functions and minor details about its style of architecture.

Content:

The added content is relevant and adds a plethora of new information, especially in the art and architecture of the building which is befitting of a high-importance article such as this. The content is free of bias.

Tone and Balance:

The article is well-balanced and has a strong emphasis on the Palazzo's artistic content, with small details about its history, be it the Black Death's effect or the storage of salt on the premises. Again, no bias.

Sources and References:

Decent list of second-party sources from scholarly appropriate places, acceptably formatted bibliography.

Organization:

Article is well-organized with content divided into two main sections, though I would've liked to see a third section devoted entirely to the Palazzo's history, since there are a lot of historical details sprinkled throughout that could probably be consolidated in one place.

Overall Impressions:

Professional work. I'm impressed with the quality of this article not just in terms of content but also organization.