User:Kendeula/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Internet activism

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose to evaluate this article for a few reasons. First, I am interested in Internet activism and it seems like a good topic for me to research. I also noticed that this article needs a lot of work, making it an even better choice.

Evaluate the article
The lead section is a bit wordy, but covers all the necessary bases. It describes and defines the topic of the article, as well as provides other common names of the topic. In terms of content, the article is lacking. There are a lot of important things regarding internet activism that are simply not there, such as the Black Lives Matter movement or the March For Our Lives movement. Some parts of the article are much longer than others, which may only have a few sentences. This also means that the article is very outdated and doesn't highlight the protests and change in culture due to internet activism. There are random short excerpts of updated information about activism, but not enough to tell the whole story. The article does seem to be neutral for the most part, which is good, no biases that I can identify. It also somewhat covers people of different backgrounds, but this can be explored further. In terms of sources, the bibliography is full of reputable sources, with only a couple of shady sources. Much of the article has decent writing, sometimes wordy or oddly structured. There were no grammatical errors that I could find, but with a third read, I'm sure I could locate some. There are no photos or media, so there is not much to look at.

In terms of the Talk Page, this project is part of three WikiProjects: Internet, Internet Culture, and Social Movements. There are not many discussions on the Talk Page and the posts are spaced out by years. Most posts are about small or bad edits, and external links. There are many things that need to be added to this Wiki page and it is not nearly as developed as it should be.