User:Kenfo 0/Mentifesto

In order to remain listed at Requests for comment/User conduct, at least two people need to show that they tried to resolve a dispute with this user and have failed. This must involve the same dispute with a single user, not different disputes or multiple users. The persons complaining must provide evidence of their efforts, and each of them must certify it by signing this page with &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;. If this does not happen within 48 hours of the creation of this dispute page (which was: 22:43, 28 October 2011 (UTC)), the page will be deleted. The current date and time is:, 29 July 2024 (UTC).



''Users should not edit other people's summaries or views, except to endorse them. All signed comments other than your own view or an endorsement should be directed to this page's discussion page.''

Statement of the dispute
''This is a summary written by users who are concerned by this user's conduct. Users signing other sections ("Response" or "Outside views") should not edit the "Statement of the dispute" section.''

Desired outcome
''This is a summary written by users who have initiated the request for comment. It should spell out exactly what the changes they'd like to see in the user, or what questions of behavior should be the focus.''

Description
{Add your summary here. You must use the endorsement section below to sign it. Anyone is welcome to endorse this or any other view, but do not change other people's views. Editors writing this section should not normally add additional views below.}

Evidence of disputed behavior
(Provide diffs. Links to entire articles aren't helpful unless the editor created the entire article. Edit histories also aren't helpful as they change as new edits are performed.)

Applicable policies and guidelines
{List the policies and guidelines that apply to the disputed conduct}

Evidence of trying and failing to resolve the dispute
(Provide diffs of the comments. As with anywhere else on this RfC/U, links to entire articles aren't helpful unless the editor created the entire article. Edit histories also aren't helpful as they change as new edits are performed.)

Users certifying the basis for this dispute
{Users who tried and failed to resolve the dispute}



Response
''This section is reserved for the use of the user whose conduct is disputed. Users writing other sections ("Statement of the dispute" and "Outside Views") should not edit the "Response" section, and the person writing this section should not write a view below. Anyone is welcome to endorse this or any other view, but no one except the editor(s) named in the dispute may change the summary here.''

{Add your summary here. You must use the endorsement section below to sign it.}

Users who endorse this summary:

Views
''This section is for statements or opinions written by users not directly involved with this dispute, but who would like to add a view of the dispute. Users should not edit other people's summaries or views, except to endorse them. All signed comments other than your own view or an endorsement should be directed to this page's discussion page. Users editing other sections ("Statement of the dispute" or "Response") should not normally edit this section, except to endorse another person's view.''

Outside view by ExampleUsername
{Add your summary here. You must use the endorsement section below to sign it. Anyone is welcome to endorse this or any other view, but do not change other people's views.}

Users who endorse this summary:

Outside view by ExampleUsername
{Add your summary here. You must use the endorsement section below to sign it. Anyone is welcome to endorse this or any other view, but do not change other people's views.}

Users who endorse this summary:

Reminder to use the talk page for discussion
All signed comments and talk not related to an endorsement should be directed to this page's discussion page. Discussion should not be added below. Discussion should be posted on the talk page. Threaded replies to another user's vote, endorsement, evidence, response, or comment should be posted to the talk page.

I have no idea how to address this, so I came here. Someone named "mentifesto" deleted comments from a discussion page related to the war in Afghanistan. I don't see where (other than the discussion page) I can address this person. This is what was in my "watchlist log": >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 27 October 2011

(Deletion log); 19:31. . Mentifisto (talk | contribs)‎ changed revision visibility of "War in Afghanistan (2001–present)": removed edit summary for 1 revision (RD3: Purely disruptive material: reverted username) (Deletion log); 19:30. . Mentifisto (talk | contribs)‎ changed revision visibility of "War in Afghanistan (2001–present)": removed username for 1 revision (RD3: Purely disruptive material) (diff | hist). . m War in Afghanistan (2001–present)‎; 18:20. . (-28) . . Mentifisto (talk | contribs)‎ (edit summary removed) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

I THOROUGHLY REJECT the idea that one person can decide "I don't like what you wrote, so I'll call it "disruptive" and delete it w/o notice". This is called "censorship". I do not care what this "member's standing" is. I demand to know EXACTLY what I wrote, how it was "purely disruptive" and why one person gets to censor others without any communication. Lastly, I want to know what "reverted username" means. This is outrageous conduct. Educated people talk about differences. If this is how you deal with ideas you don't like, I will find a way to "return the favor".

Thank you for your time.

Kenfo 0 (talk) 22:43, 28 October 2011 (UTC)