User:Keniett J. Vazquez/Animal attack/Ayub Shahada Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * This is the evaluation of the draft of Keniett J. Vazquez
 * User:Keniett J. Vazquez/Animal attack
 * By Ayub Shahada

Lead evaluation:

The Lead of your article was very useful. It gave me a great overview of the topic and the article’s information. It’s brief and not over-detailed.

Content evaluation:

The information in your article was very useful and up to date. Some tips: I think you can also add the time that it takes to recover and being treated after being attacked. Also, you can add more to the information you have about the importance of the rabies vaccine on pets and how it prevents the infection.

Tone and balance evaluation:

The content is neutral and following Wikipedia’s policy. The content is not trying to persuade about one position or another.

Sources and references evaluation:

Sources of information are reliable and well cited. Links work perfectly, are up to date, and opened to the public.

Organization evaluation:

Content is clear and easy to read. Sections are well organized according to the topic. I didn’t see any grammar or spelling errors. Great Job.

Images and media evaluation

The article has one image and is following the copyright guidelines. You can also add some images about bites on humans or images about the vaccine to give more visual information for the reader.

Overall evaluation

The content you added improved the article. It sounds more formal and relevant. It has great useful information about bites and treatments.