User:Kenneth Ugalde/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Moira Johnston

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

I chose this article because I support educating individuals about gender bias present in society; Moira Johnston specifically stuck out to me because her activism took place in the United States which made it easier to connect with. As exemplified in this article this is matters because there are so many laws that are applied to men and women, but exclude a women's perspective of that law or treat the law as if it only men have the right. My initial impression was that this article brought awareness to what Moira Johnston stands for, but lacks depth on this subject and does not provide much other info.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

This article's lead section gets straight to the topic of the writing, while also giving a quick introduction to the context of the article. Although the article's content is neutrally relevant to the topic, there is a lack of depth on the subject missing some deeper information about the awareness of the gender biased laws. The reference region shows working links containing proof of the events but missing some possible links providing information about the laws. The image can be very straight forward, however it gives a better visual understanding to the reading. The talk page contains a view history which shows how the article is frequently edited despite their lack of conversations. Overall the article quickly got to the point and addressed a major issue, unfortunately this article is underdeveloped and has a lack information and would benefit with a better detailed description on the subject. ~