User:KennyKetchum/Seven Interpretive Essays on Peruvian Reality/Ag611232 Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? KennyKetchum
 * Link to draft you're reviewing:https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Seven_Interpretive_Essays_on_Peruvian_Reality&action=history

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer? Yes
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?Yes, it does a really good job at that
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?Yes it does.
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? Nope
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?It's pretty concise.

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic? Yes it is
 * Is the content added up-to-date? Yes
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? Nope

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral? Yes everything is pretty neutral.
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? Nope
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? The ones that were under represented were added by you and you did a really good job at this.
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?No it does not.

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? Yes some of it is
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? Yes the Sources are all really good
 * Are the sources current? Yes most of them are.
 * Check a few links. Do they work? Yes they all work.

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? Yes
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? Not that I could find.
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? Yes it is well organized