User:KenzeeF/Hamus (archaea)/JakeTayon Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

KenzeeR


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:KenzeeF/Hamus_%28archaea%29?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Lead:
The lead has been updated. The introductory sentence is not relevant to Hami specifically. The last couple of sentences in the lead paragraph would serve as a better intro sentence. It does not have a brief description of the major sections. The lead is concise.

Content:
The content is only a summary of archaea and their discovery. There is not much that is relevant to the Hamus of archaea. A short summary of archaea would be okay, but the article should direct its focus on Hami.

Tone and Balance:
The content is neutral and unbiased with no attempt at persuasion.

Sources and References:
All of the sources are current and representative of the available literature on what has ben spoken about. The links do work.

Organization:
The content is easy to read. I. could not find any grammatical issues.

Images and Media:
There are no images

Overall:
The article could use some more content relevant to Hami. The summary of the 3 domain hypothesis and description isn't really needed. Just speaking about the Hamus and other archaeal appendages will be enough.