User:Kenzzippel/Zoë Wicomb/Shortestcoffee Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

User:Kenzzippel/Zoë Wicomb


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Kenzzippel/Zoë Wicomb
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Zoë Wicomb

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

The lead has been updated and includes an informative sentence as the introduction. The lead is effective, however more information Should be added since it is only one sentence long. The introduction should be concise, but still longer than just one sentence.

The content appears to be up to date and is provides important information to the reader. The "career" section is very effective however, the other sections should have more information ("early life" is only 3 sentences). The article does feature an "equity gap" since the Zoe Wicomb is African.

The tone of the article is effective. All sources and references are correct.

The article is well organized and includes effective headings and sub-headings. The writing style is easy to follow and the points are concise. I did not notice any spelling or grammatical errors.

There are no images included in the article. If a picture of Zoe Wicomb was included, this would help the reader put a face to the person they are reading about.

The information is the article currently is effective, but there should be more detail added. The "career" section is good, but the other sections still need more information added.