User:Kessynapon/Evaluate an Article

Evaluate an article

 * lovesickness : Lovesickness
 * I chosen this article because as soon as I saw the title i was intrigued because i had no idea that being lovesick was a real thing, I always thought that it was something that people could not really
 * experience. While reading the article, i realized that it was actually a mental illness , which made me want to do more research on it. Also , I noticed that the article did not contain enough information , wich made me want to make the article better.

Lead

 * The lead include an introductory sentence that clearly describes the article's topic and . Yet, it is
 * vague and not enough detailed.

Content

 * Guiding questions
 * The article content is absolutly relevant to the topic. it only focus on lovesickness and what it does to people that experience it. The last time this article has been updated was in december 2020.

What is missing is the content that concern what being lovesick does to your brain. The information is there, but it is not enough detailed. The article relate to Roméo and Juliet, because what both of them has experienced was a form of lovesickness.

Tone and Balance

 * Guiding questions
 * the article is very neutral, there no position statement. By reading the article , you can tell that the purpose of the article has been made just to inform the people that are going to read it. They are not trying to persuade the reader, it is statement of relevant information.

Sources and References

 * Not all the facts in the article are backed up by reliable secondary source information, some of the information is not cited. Most of the sources used are reliable and current. Also , most of the links are working perfectly.
 * Not all the facts in the article are backed up by reliable secondary source information, some of the information is not cited. Most of the sources used are reliable and current. Also , most of the links are working perfectly.

Organization

 * even if there is a lack of information, the text is very clear and easy to read. I did not had an hard time reading this article. It is well written , the grammar is good. Also , the article is put into different section , but you can tell that it is put in order. It is following each other. This is well organized.
 * even if there is a lack of information, the text is very clear and easy to read. I did not had an hard time reading this article. It is well written , the grammar is good. Also , the article is put into different section , but you can tell that it is put in order. It is following each other. This is well organized.

Images and Media

 * This article only include one image and this image represent the sick  of Antiochus. Under the image, there is no caption but the author has stated what the image represent in the article. Also the article ashere to Wikipedia copyright regulations.
 * This article only include one image and this image represent the sick  of Antiochus. Under the image, there is no caption but the author has stated what the image represent in the article. Also the article ashere to Wikipedia copyright regulations.

Checking the talk page

 * Guiding questions
 * People on the talk page are talking about how being lovesick is something that is very real and how some of them experienced it. Some people also states that some information are lacking. Also, they are stating that this article should have the attention of psychologists.This article is part of a wikiproject of psychology.

Overall impressions

 * The article just need more details, but overall it is a good article. The information are there. I'd say that the article strenght is when the author stated a couple of example likeRoméoe et Juliet to explain how
 * being lovesick can be like. It is still a underdevelopped article.
 * being lovesick can be like. It is still a underdevelopped article.