User:Kev2kus/History of video games/Dlozano04 Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Kev2kus
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: History of video games

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * The Lead has not been updated yet.
 * The Lead does include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic but it's too much information at once and it needs separate sections because it goes off a tangent and speaks about well known Pong and other games that doesn't really fit in with the Lead.
 * The Lead includes a description of the article's major sections but it could be updated.
 * The Lead includes information that is not present in the article.
 * The Lead is overly detailed?

Content
Guiding questions:


 * There has been no content added.
 * There is content that does not belong in the Lead, it needs to be under a separate section.
 * The article address topics related to historically underrepresented topics.

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * There has been no content added but it is neutral.
 * There are no biased claims, everything is just informative.
 * There are viewpoints that are overrepresented.
 * There has been no content added yet.

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * All new content is backed up by sources.
 * The sources are reliable and focus on the topic.
 * The sources are current in a sense given even though the topic is historical, new information and sources are there.
 * The sources are written by a very diverse spectrum of authors.
 * The few links I checked do work.

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? N/A
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? N/A
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? N/A

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * The article does include images but they can be improved by making the size bigger and adding more because there is more information described.
 * The images are well captioned.
 * All images follow Wikipedia's guidelines.
 * The images are not laid out in an appealing way, they look squished, theres room for improvement there.

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete? N/A
 * What are the strengths of the content added? N/A
 * How can the content added be improved? N/A