User:KevBlaze/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
History of architecture

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this article because it is directly correlated to the History of Architecture Course that many architects and engineers take in college.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

The lead section does a good job explaining the key elements listed. It gives educational background and prepares the reader for the rest of the article. The content is relevant to the history of architecture and is up to date. The content links other articles that are relevant to the subject. The article has a neutral tone because it has been edited many times by various people. There are a plethora of sources and they seem to be up to date and relatable. The article is very organized and is chronologically ordered for each era of architecture. The media in the article does a great job supplementing the article key points. There is many discussion on the talk page of using the correct images and making sure each section stays within its informational boundary's. The articles status is level 3 vital article. Its strength is there is a good amount of information given but it can be improved by combining certain sections to make broader sections to read. It is a well developed article with much information.