User:KevDuguay/Suburb/Sedonap Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? KevDuguay
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: Suburb

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer? N/A
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic? Yes, The content you added was very relevant, and we talked about it in class as well.
 * Is the content added up-to-date? Yes, the reference was from 2003, which is relevant enough.
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? no

Content evaluation
The content you added was very good.

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral? Yes
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? No, I actually thought you did very well in adding content that is neutral and unbiased, yet very informative.
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? You can talk more about the effects of the shopping malls, as it would flow nicely with the ending.
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? no

Tone and balance evaluation
Your tone is very informative yet still interesting, and also possibly adding a little bit more about the effects or history would help as well.

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? Yes, the source is reliable
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? Yes
 * Are the sources current? Yes
 * Check a few links. Do they work? Yes

Sources and references evaluation
All of your sources and links were great

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? yes, it was very easy to understand what you wrote
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors?No
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? Yes

Organization evaluation
Yes, what you wrote is very concise and well written. You did a great job

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media N/A


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
 * Are images well-captioned?
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?

For New Articles Only
'''If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above. N/A'''


 * Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject?
 * How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject?
 * Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles?
 * Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable?

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete? Yes, you did a great job adding more information about suburbs, and it is relevant to our class.
 * What are the strengths of the content added? It is non persuasive and very directive.
 * How can the content added be improved?I think that adding more about the effects and why the location of a shopping mall effects the suburbs as well.

Overall evaluation
The content you added was very direct and informative. I thought you did a great job with adding facts and information that helped the article. Continue to write more about the suburbs and shopping centers.