User:Kevin-.Baker1138/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Brick - Wikipedia

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I think bricks are cool and historically bricks are some of the best tools in uncovering ancient civilizations. And the article was very concise and informative. The previous authors did phenomenal research

Evaluate the article
The lead does include a introduction sentence that not only introduces the topic but makes something as boring as bricks sound at least a bit more interesting.

The language in this article was very professional and informative. No red flags in the language.

The photo of the brick was in fact a brick. Helped bring the article together.

The talk page had some very good discussions, makes it easy to be included in the discussion.

The article is very long, and it needs to be. There is a vast history of bricks, and it is covered so the length of the article is valid.

The page goes into the nitty gritty of bricks and while the history could be interesting, there is a lot of extra information. I think that it may be beneficial to the reader that we divide the page up and keep a majority of the fine details out of the overview section. If the reader wants to learn about the fine details, they should choose to go to the rest of the article.