User:Kevpinder/Anticyclonic storm

"Article Evaluation"

Everything in the article relates to an anticyclonic storm, however, I think too much weather is presented that can distract the viewer from the focus of an anticyclonic storm. For example, there is a "part of series on weather" list that has multiple links to different weather events and other phenomena where it is hard to find where the anticyclonic storm is located within these tabs. Upon further examination, "anticyclonic storm" is not even listed in this. Only "anticyclone" is which seems to be a totally different page. The article has accurate scientific information, but it gets all of its information from one source. Different sources should be added and content should be presented as deemed appropriate and would thus improve the article as a whole. Multiple Wikipedia hyperlinks are provided throughout the article such as northern hemisphere, Coriolis effect, great red spot, etc.

The tone of the article represents a neutral approach. It is very independent and presents the facts appropriately and without bias.

For the sources, the page uses one main source, a book, entitled, The Weather Book, by Jack Williams. There is no link. For the picture provided within the article, a link is provided to the NASA website.

There is absolutely zero discussion on the article's talk page. This page has been subject to an assignment before and is apart of WikiProject Meteorology. The article has been rated Stub-Class on the project's quality scale and rated low importance on the project's importance scale.