User:Kexinma/The Mermaid (2016 film)/Hannahisamyth Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

I'm reviewing Kexinma's work.


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Kexinma/The Mermaid (2016 film)


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * The Mermaid (2016 film)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)


 * 1) The Lead does not show any new content from the original wikipedia article.
 * 2) And it does not include an introduction or brief description about the article's topic.
 * 3) I do not think this group understands what should a lead contains.
 * 4) This lead is more like a movie's plot.

The article is relevant to the topic, but the content is not original.


 * 1) The content reads like a machine translation.
 * 2) After go through the original wikipedia article, this article is translated from the original Chinese Wikipedia.

The citation of the article also has some serious issues.


 * 1) There is no in-text citation in this article.
 * 2) The format of the references list is not correct and there is no link at all.
 * 3) All the references are from Wikipedia without any academic resources.

The organization of the article is confusing.


 * 1) There is no manual verification after using machine translation and this leads to confusion when reading.
 * 2) There are no misspellings, but there are some puzzling words, like "Beautiful fish."
 * 3) It is not well organized at all, none of the headlines are in italics

There is no image or media used in this article


 * 1) The content does not improve the quality of the article.
 * 2) All contents are translated versions of the original Chinese article.